Settlers Turn Timer

Common uses for a settlers turn timer

Resource-trading board games
Timeboxing the trade phase
Larger player counts
Keeping a game night to schedule

Resource-trading games have an unusual timing problem: the build phase is short and the trade phase is open-ended. One player's turn can involve negotiating with three other people, each of whom has an incentive to keep talking. Timing the turn as a whole is the blunt fix; timing the trade phase specifically is the better one.

Sixty seconds covers roll, trade and build comfortably at three or four players. At five or six the trade phase has more counterparties and needs more time, but the total game length also grows, so many groups shorten the per-turn budget instead and accept fewer trades.

The trade phase is the real problem

Rolling and building take seconds. Negotiation expands to fill whatever time it is given, and it involves every player, so the cost of an over-long trade phase is multiplied by the whole table.

Timing just the trade phase — thirty seconds, say, with the build happening after — solves most of the problem while leaving the strategic part of the turn untouched. It also makes offers sharper, because a player with thirty seconds proposes rather than muses.

Player count changes the arithmetic

A turn budget that works at three players produces a much longer game at six, because there are twice as many turns per round and twice as many potential trading partners per turn.

The common approach is to shorten the per-turn budget as the player count grows, so total round length stays roughly constant. Sixty seconds at three or four, forty-five at five, thirty at six is a workable ladder.

Do not time other people's decisions

The turn timer applies to the active player. Timing how long a trading partner takes to accept or refuse an offer punishes people for being asked, and it produces reflex refusals rather than considered ones.

If responses are genuinely dragging, the fix is a table norm — answer offers promptly — rather than a second clock. Two clocks in a casual game is one clock too many.

A workable ladder that keeps total round length roughly constant as the table grows.

Turn budget by player count
Players	Full turn	Trade phase	Round length
3	60 s	30 s	~3 min
4	60 s	30 s	~4 min
5	45 s	25 s	~4 min
6	30 s	20 s	~3 min
Teaching game	+50%	+50%	Longer

Time the trade phase rather than the whole turn where possible — negotiation is what expands, not building.
The timer applies to the active player only. Timing trading partners produces reflex refusals.

Source: Turn budgets for resource-trading games are gaming group convention rather than any publisher's rule

Sources

Turn budgets for resource-trading games are gaming group convention rather than any publisher's rule , TheTimerLab — accessed 2026-07-28

🔗 Related Timers

Board Game Turn Timer

Tabletop Wargame Chess Clock

Trading Card Game Round Timer

Charades Turn Timer

Poker Blind Level Timer

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

How long should a turn be in a resource-trading game?

Sixty seconds at three or four players covers roll, trade and build comfortably. Shorten it as the table grows — around forty-five at five and thirty at six — so total round length stays roughly constant.

Should I time the whole turn or just the trading?

Just the trading, where you can. Rolling and building take seconds; negotiation expands to fill whatever time it gets, and it involves the whole table, so that is where the time actually goes.

Does timing the trade phase change how people trade?

Yes, usually for the better. A player with thirty seconds makes concrete proposals rather than musing about possibilities, which speeds the whole table up rather than just the active player.

Why does player count matter so much?

Six players means twice as many turns per round as three, and twice as many potential trading partners per turn. Keeping the same per-turn budget roughly doubles round length.

Should I time trading partners' responses?

No. The timer applies to the active player. Timing how long someone takes to accept or refuse punishes them for being asked and produces reflex refusals instead of considered ones.

What if responses are genuinely dragging?

Use a table norm — answer offers promptly — rather than a second clock. Two clocks in a casual game is one clock too many and turns the evening into an administrative exercise.