Moot Court Argument Timer
Embed this timer
Copy and paste this snippet into your website or blog post. Free to use — please keep the credit link so others can find the timer.
Add to Home Screen
Tap Share in Safari, then choose "Add to Home Screen".
Common uses for a moot court argument timer
- Moot court practice rounds
- Competition preparation
- Timing a bench
- Practising rebuttal reservation
Moot court arguments are typically fifteen minutes per side, often split between two advocates, with the petitioner reserving a portion — commonly two to three minutes — for rebuttal. The clock runs continuously through judicial questioning, which is what makes moot court timing unlike any other speaking format.
Fifteen minutes sounds generous and is not, because judges interrupt. An advocate who has planned fifteen minutes of argument will deliver perhaps six of it, with the rest of the time consumed by questions and the answers to them.
Plan for interruption, not for a speech
The best-prepared advocates have a roadmap of three or four points and can enter any of them from any question. Advocates with a linear script are derailed by the first question and never recover the thread.
A practical target is to prepare six minutes of core argument for a fifteen-minute slot. If the bench is quiet you expand; if it is hot you have already covered your essentials before the questions consume the rest.
Reserving rebuttal
The petitioner states at the outset how much time they wish to reserve, commonly two or three minutes. That time is deducted from the main argument, so reserving four minutes leaves eleven for everything else.
Losing track and having the reservation eaten by a long answer is a classic error. Watching the clock during questioning, rather than only during your own speaking, is what prevents it.
Answer first, then argue
The convention is to answer a judge's question directly — yes, no, or the specific concession — before explaining. Advocates who begin with context and reach the answer thirty seconds later read as evasive, which costs more than the time does.
It is also faster. A direct answer often ends the line of questioning, where an evasive one invites three more questions and consumes the argument entirely.
A common structure. Competitions set their own times — the rules packet is authoritative.
| Element | Time | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Per side | 15 min | Often split between two advocates |
| Rebuttal reservation | 2–3 min | Deducted from the main argument |
| Prepared core argument | ~6 min | The rest goes to questions |
| Warning signal | 2 min left | Bench or timekeeper |
| Respondent | 15 min | No rebuttal |
| Clock during questions | Running | Always |
- Prepare a roadmap you can enter from any point, not a linear script — the first question derails a script permanently.
- Answer the question directly before explaining. Evasive answers invite three more questions and consume the argument.
Source: Moot court argument times are competition convention; individual competitions set their own rules
Sources
- Moot court argument times are competition convention; individual competitions set their own rules , TheTimerLab — accessed 2026-07-28